I know rendering a mp4 from Studio Artist can be an intensive process, but I was wondering if there's an advantage in using a format like ProRes over a codec like mp4 or h.264 as a source file loaded into Studio Artist?
I've traditionally rendered original media out to tif image sequences or ProRes movies (especially if I need to work in Final Cut Pro at some point - though I've done this less frequently with the advent of FCP X)
You need to be a member of Studio Artist to add comments!
Apple has released some new software that will require my upgrading to their latest OS.I'm worried that by doing so I will break SA 5.5Does anyone here use SA successfully with Sonoma 14.5?Any info is greatly appreciated.
Read more…is it possible to change/control what pallets appear in the Grad Tab?
Read more…"Nü Müzak" video made with MSGs. The muzak (haha) was made with Bespoke Synth (cool free modular music program). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRSzm1-QBMI&t=305s&ab_channel=Thorrific
Read more…I am looking for an Art Deco type effect, does anyone have that type of effect...?
Read more…
Replies
In general, i don't think the format of the source movie codec is going to matter very much, as far as Studio Artist processing is concerned.
But maybe if you're doing something in your effect processing that really pulls compression artifacts in the source movie frames up into view in the effected output (like a really intensive enhancement algorithm for example), then ProRes might be better?