You need to be a member of Studio Artist to add comments!
Recording into an open stream (flag write at end of paseq cycle enabled), yields very different results visually. The saturation and path/stroke buildup effects are less extreme - looking very washed-out and delicate in comparison. (in a good way - sorta...) certain watery brushes are entirely transformed dynamically speaking.
there is obviously something i don't understand - does this ring a bell?
This reply was deleted.
Mac OS 14 compatability question
Apple has released some new software that will require my upgrading to their latest OS.I'm worried that by doing so I will break SA 5.5Does anyone here use SA successfully with Sonoma 14.5?Any info is greatly appreciated.
Read more…MSG Advanced Editor question
is it possible to change/control what pallets appear in the Grad Tab?
Read more…Nü Müzak
"Nü Müzak" video made with MSGs. The muzak (haha) was made with Bespoke Synth (cool free modular music program). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRSzm1-QBMI&t=305s&ab_channel=Thorrific
Read more…I am looking for an Art Deco type effect
I am looking for an Art Deco type effect, does anyone have that type of effect...?
Read more…
Replies
Many PASeqs have random components in the individual action steps they use to generate an effect. So running the same PASeq multiple times can generate subtle variations in the individual images generated for a given frame number.
If you have more than one movie stream write flag turned on you would introduce additional output frames and other artifacts. So that could affect the timing as well as what you see in individual output frames.
Many PASeqs do recursive processing,where they modify and overwrite what is on a previously generated frame. So depending on what was in the canvas when you started processing the perceived output effect could be seen as being very different when running a PASeq on the different starting canvases.